A call to sign. · 2008-08-19 05:44
I hate to ask, the new electio ByLaw is the fault of provincial and city incumbents and their parties.
I need 25 Signatures (granted I have some, but I am looking to fill all 48 spots. Just in case.
Some may need to be non-partisan about this ballot access thing, it isn’t a vote for anything but choices. Some supporters may need to be open about it with me and let me know you vote for me and where and when would be the best time.
PArk and School board responsibilities should at least, in my view, be a city council duty and I don’t care who wins pointless offices so they can sign my paper to be put on the top of my list (even know there will be “if I cared list on the site”).
You are legally allowed to sign more than one paper for the same or different office except your own and I’ll swap signatures with Candidates, I don’t care about your stance, that’s for voting. If your with a Major Party, you will be separated as a good guy in this election bylaw, COPE-NPA-VISION are bad guys in general for endorcing such a ByLaw unanimously, why support them? 2 Signatures is enough as the willing to run’s and the election officer.
If you agree with the bylaw then why not prove it and sign the paper? Put your ink and name where your mouth is. If not vote against party and candidate incumbancy.
I will fight to see this repealed.
— Gölök ZLF Buday
MyView
Commenting is closed for this article.